As government and industry sprint toward an AI-powered future, it's the unanswered questions, not the glowing promises, that should give us pause, writesRoss Monaghan.

HAVING GIVEN the world a taste of the possibilities of artificial intelligence, the AI sector is now in full-throttle sales mode with government and industry, using sales techniques as old as time: hurry, buy now or youll miss out.

Responsible AI will solve all our pressing problems, according to theAI in Australia Economic Blueprint, published this week and produced by a consulting firm on behalf ofOpenAI.

It clearly aims to encourage government and regulators to rush AI adoption.

Australia could harness AI to significantly boost economic prosperity, enhance public services and position itself as a leader, according to the blueprint.

Artificial intelligence could end poverty, heal the earth and free humanity but only if we code it for compassion andnot forprofit.

The report says:

Whats significant, however, is what the report doesnt say.

While it paints a glowing picture of AI adoption, OpenAIs CEO,Sam Altman, highlighted the problems inOpenAIs podcastthis week.

People have a very high degree of trust in ChatGPT, which is interesting, because AI hallucinates. It should be the tech that you dont trust that much, Altman said about ChatGPT, in what amounts to the fine print of the report.

When future problems are inevitably found with the accuracy of AI services, the industry will be able to point to early public proclamations of problems with the technology and say, We told you so.

But even Altman seems to be hallucinating when talking about AI. Despite his claim that people trust AI, evidence suggests otherwise.

A 2024research reportin the UK byThe Alan Turing Institutefound that people under 35 are themost trustingof AI, but even 59% of that demographic do not trust it. More worrying for governments isresearchby the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet in 2023, which found that more Australians distrust the Government's ability to responsibly use AI to provide personalised services (34%) than trust the Government (29%).

We keep asking what AI can do, but the real danger is using it without knowing what it is.

Regardless of trust, while there arebillions of dollarsto be made, the promise of AI will be pushed frantically by the sector that dominates some of the worlds biggest organisations. The top six organisations inthat listproduce silicon chips, own the data centres and infrastructure, or sell business and consumer products reliant on AI.

For those not in the sector, rushing to commit to AI adoption can be an irresistible lure. The tech bros are targeting government services and sectors that require significant human input. For leaders wanting to quickly reduce costs, replacing people with technology that works 24/7, 365 days a year, looks feasible. Long term, however, the ramifications will be profound.

Data security, privacy, equity, stakeholder engagement and other issues will inevitably emerge, and without a human workforce to deal with these challenges, who will solve them?

For businesses with significant brand and reputation risks, relying on the same AI products and services as their competitors will lead to bland strategies, communication and products.

In classrooms, students could use AI services to supercharge their learning, but most use them to quickly and effortlesslyproduce assessmentswhile learning little. Outside the classroom, many of their friends areAI chatbots, so their ability to understand and empathise with others, let alone engage with them, is limited.

University students graduating with little more than the skill of being able to prompt AI, and experienced professionals in the workplace being replaced by humans with AI, will lead to a worldwide skills shortage and growing inequity in society.

AI will certainly play a substantial role in government, business and society in the future, but racing towards adoption without thorough analysis and policy is dangerous.

Too much is at stake. The risks of rushing into AI adoption are significant. Weve already seen damage to society from the quick and unregulated adoption of social media, as the Australian Government is learning now, with its world-leading ban on teenagers using social media.

Putting a genie back in a bottle is impossible.

Ross Monaghanis a former journalist, professional communication manager and CEO.

Related Articles

• Artificial Intelligence must be codified with a conscience
• Before we ask what AI can do, lets ask what kind of AI were talking about
• AI power consumption demands a rethink for energy infrastructure
• DeepSeek gives China breakthrough in AI development
• The humble spreadsheet is about to get a whole lot smarter